Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Acute care child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient service in a teaching hospital in the US.
40 inpatients (mean age 13 y, 83% boys) with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of conduct disorder. All patients were admitted to hospital with histories of severe aggression and met the aggression criterion during a 2 week placebo baseline period. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of mental retardation, pervasive developmental disorder, major depressive disorder or dysthymic disorder, bipolar disorder, or psychotic disorder; substance dependence in the previous month; pregnancy; received psychoactive medication within the past 2 weeks; had a previous lithium trial; or had a major medical problem. All patients completed the treatment phase.
20 patients were allocated to lithium, initial dose was 600 mg/day and was increased by 300 mg/day to a target dose (titrated between 300 and 2100 mg/d) with the aim of obtaining a steady state therapeutic concentration of 0.8 to 1.2 mmol/l and no or minimal side effects. 20 patients were allocated to placebo.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome measures were the Global Clinical Judgments (Consensus) Scale (GCJCS), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and the Overt Aggression Scale (OAS).
More patients in the lithium group were classified as responders on the GCJCS and CGI (showed moderate or marked improvement) than those in the placebo group (p=0.004 for both scales) (table⇓). Ratings on the OAS decreased more for those in the lithium group than for those in the placebo group (mean decrease at 4 weeks 2.4 v 1.2, p=0.04). No patients dropped out of the study because of lithium associated side effects even though more patients in the lithium group had nausea, vomiting, and urinary frequency than those in the placebo group (p=0.05).
In children and adolescents in hospital with severe aggression and conduct disorder, lithium reduced the frequency and severity of aggression and was well tolerated.
This study by Malone et al may be helpful to child psychiatrists working in inpatient or residential care facilities and caring for conduct disordered youth with severe aggressive outbursts, especially those African-American or Hispanic youth from low income backgrounds with conduct disorder who are physically aggressive at least twice weekly. The low number needed to treat shows the efficacy of lithium in reducing aggression in this population. This clear result, however, is tempered by design issues and clinically significant side effects. The treatment staff or research team completed the instruments used to measure treatment response. Side effects like frequent urination and vomiting were noted in the lithium group, leaving the blinding of the staff open to question. Also, the time period was too brief for patients to develop acne from lithium, and no data are offered about the prevalence of important comorbidities like substance use, subsyndromal bipolar disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder.
For many child psychiatrists the psychopharmacological choices in working with children with conduct disorder and severe aggression might also include divalproex. A comparable study (double blind, crossover) showed clear efficacy for divalproex over placebo in 20 outpatient children and adolescents (80% boys) with a disruptive behaviour disorder (oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder), an explosive temper (≥4 outbursts or fights per month on minimal provocation), and mood lability (multiple daily distinct shifts).1 This study population was also composed mainly of minorities (60% Hispanic, 25% African-American) and 6 out of 20 abused marijuana. The number needed to treat to reach improvement defined as a ≥70% reduction on a scale of overt aggression was 2. The only side effect was weight gain.
Child psychiatrists may wish to compare results from these studies in choosing between lithium and divalproex.