Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Review: 7.7 to 12.9 units of alcohol per week is the level of alcohol consumption at which mortality is the lowest in men
  1. Woody Caan, MA, DPhil
  1. Society of Health Education and Health Promotion, Specialists, Cambridge, UK,

Statistics from

OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

QUESTION: What is the level of alcohol consumption at which mortality is the lowest (nadir)?

Data sources

Studies were identified in Medline using the key words alcohol, drinking, beer, wine, spirits, mortality, death, and coronary heart disease. References of recent reviews were scanned and experts in the field were contacted.

Study selection

Studies were selected if they were cohort studies in industrialised countries that related all cause mortality to alcohol consumption. Studies were excluded if they did not report mortality for men and women separately or if they reported <3 levels of alcohol consumption.

Data extraction

Relative risks of all cause mortality, adjusted for age, and where possible, other risk factors including socioeconomic status, education, smoking, and physical health, were extracted for each level of alcohol consumption in each study. Amounts of alcohol were converted to units per week (1 unit of alcohol = 9 g).

Main results

21 articles reporting 20 studies (1 210 545 participants) were included. 60 224 deaths among men (13%) and 74 824 deaths among women (10%) occurred. In men, 12 of 19 estimated nadirs were <10 units/week and 3 were >20 units/week. In women, 4 of 8 estimated nadirs were <5 units/week and 1 was >10 units/week. Nadirs varied between countries but not within countries. Nadirs for men and women pooled at the country level are in the table. Nadirs were estimated for men from 10 US studies and 3 UK studies. 6 other countries only contributed 1 nadir each. Nadirs were estimated for women from 7 US studies and only 1 non-US nadir was contributed. When adjustment was made for smoking, blood pressure, exclusion of participants with baseline coronary heart disease, and exclusion of ex-drinkers, the nadir did not change by more than 3 units/week. 6 studies that provided results by age group showed no relation between nadir and age; the pooled estimated nadirs were appropriate for ages 50–80 years.

Level of alcohol consumption at which mortality is the lowest (nadir)


The level of alcohol consumption at which mortality is the lowest (nadir) is between 7.7 and 12.9 units of alcohol per week in men and is 2.9 units of alcohol per week in women, for ages 50–80 years (table).


The alcohol industry and others have long promoted the idea of an “optimal” level of alcohol consumption at which there is a relative reduction in overall mortality. White suggests that it is possible to estimate the safest levels of consumption, at least for men, in the 50–80 year age group in the US and UK. One methodological problem with this review is that it combines studies using different measures of alcohol intake. Weekly consumption may not be the best measure to study mortality. For example, a study done in Russia showed that a pattern of weekend binges may predict alcohol related deaths.1 A life history perspective often helps because people at risk of alcohol related deaths vary their consumption over time.2 In practice, it seems that questions on participants' “usual consumption” do not produce the same result as keeping a drink diary for a specific week.

Despite these methodological issues, most studies produced a U-shaped risk curve. In other words, participants drinking a moderate amount of alcohol per week have lower mortality rates than either abstainers or those drinking higher levels of alcohol. 2 studies with younger participants (<30 y), however, did not show this U-shaped curve. Instead, these studies showed a monotonic increase in mortality as intake rose, similar to a more recent study of UK men.3

Practitioners judging the potential for a protective or harmful action need to consider more than the dose response relation between alcohol and mortality. Alcohol consumption can also negatively affect the patient in other ways including reducing participation in health screening,4 increasing life stress, and reducing social support5 in ways that predict “sick” old age.



  • Source of funding: no external funding.

  • For correspondence: Mr I R White, Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Fax +44 (0)20 7637 2853.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.