Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Psychological interventions
Systemic family therapy is not superior to treatment as usual in preventing repeat self-harm in adolescents
  1. Shilpa Aggarwal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Shilpa Aggarwal, Department of Psychiatry, Deakin University, Geelong VIC 3125, Australia; shilpazq{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Commentary on: Cottrell DJ, Wright-Hughes A, Collinson M, et al. Effectiveness of systemic family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people after self-harm: a pragmatic, phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018;5:203–16.

What is already known on this topic

Families influence self-harm in adolescents by either contributing towards it or offering protection against it.1 With limited evidence for individually focused interventions for repeat self-harm in adolescents, evaluation of interventions making use of family’s strengths and resources is a potential option.2 Attachment-based family therapy (ABFT) and multisystem family therapy (MST) are specific family therapy (FT) frameworks that have been tested for self-harm in adolescents.3 ABFT decreased suicidal ideation (secondary outcome) at the end of treatment over 3 months and over 12 weeks of follow-up after completion of treatment.3 MST found a reduction in suicide attempts in adolescents in the home-based …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors SA is the sole contributor.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.