Statistics from Altmetric.com
How does the efficacy of the new method of bifrontal electrode placement for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) compare with standard bitemporal or right unilateral placement in people with depression?
237 adults (age 20–87 years) with acute depression and a DSM-IV diagnosis of primary major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder, with or without psychosis, who had been referred for ECT.
Five Consortium for Research in ECT centres in the USA; 2001–2006.
ECT three times a week using bifrontal, bitemporal or right unilateral placement of the electrodes. ECT was delivered using the Thymatron DGx ECT device, bifrontal and bitemporal at one and a half times seizure threshold, right unilateral at six times seizure threshold. Patients were treated until they achieved prespecified remission criteria (≥60% decrease from baseline in HRSD-24 total score; HRSD-24 ≤10 on two consecutive ratings; and HRSD-24 not changing >3 points on the last two consecutive treatments). Participants were classed as non-remitters if they received at least 10 sessions without meeting remission criteria.
Depressive symptoms (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, HRSD-24), remission (defined above), …
Source of funding National Institute of Mental Health.
Competing interests None.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.