Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
How effective are behavioural therapies for depression?
Depressive symptoms (either self-rated—eg, Beck Depression Inventory, or clinician rated—eg, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale).
Systematic review with meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, DARE, CINAHL, AMED and the British Nursing Index were searched from inception to January 2006 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Reference lists of identified studies were hand searched.
Study selection and analysis:
Two reviewers appraised studies and selected RCTs of behavioural therapy in adults (aged ⩾16 years) with a primary diagnosis of depression. Treatments could be delivered in a community or inpatient setting. Behavioural therapy had to be individual, time limited, and based on changing the behavioural consequences of environmental or cognitive triggers. Comparator treatments could include cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) or cognitive therapy, brief psychotherapies, supportive counselling, treatment as usual, waiting list or other inactive control. Two reviewers rated study quality and extracted data. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data, but if this was not successful, standard deviations were imputed from other related studies. Random effect meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan software. Separate meta-analyses were carried out for different comparator groups. Heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 statistic.
Twenty RCTs were identified which met inclusion criteria, but 3 of the RCTs did not have enough data to be included in the meta-analyses. Behavioural therapy reduced depressive symptoms compared to control at the end of treatment (12 RCTs, 459 participants; controls included waiting lists, treatment as usual and relaxation). There was no significant difference between behavioural therapy and cognitive therapy or CBT in depressive symptoms post-treatment or at an average of 4 months’ follow-up (post-treatment: 12 RCTs, 476 participants; follow up: 8 RCTs, 271 participants). Behavioural therapy reduced depressive symptoms post-treatment and at an average of 4.5 months’ follow-up compared to brief psychotherapy (post-treatment: 3 RCTs, 166 participants; follow up: 2 RCTs, 96 participants). Compared to supportive counselling, behavioural therapy reduced symptoms of depression post-treatment (2 RCTs, 45 participants). See online table.
Individual behavioural therapy reduces symptoms of depression more than control, supportive counselling or brief psychotherapy. It provides similar reductions in depressive symptoms to cognitive therapy and CBT.
Ekers D, Richards D, Gilbody S. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of behavioural treatment of depression. Psychol Med 2008;38:611−23.
Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is the most well-researched and established psychotherapeutic approach for treating depression.1 However, as with antidepressant medications,2 many unanswered questions remain about the mechanisms through which CBT for depression produces its therapeutic effects. Is it the distinctive cognitive techniques that are producing the majority of the benefits, or are the other non-cognitive elements also a key part of the treatment?
The meta-analysis by Ekers and colleagues provides a tantalising piece of the puzzle. They conducted a comprehensive quantitative review of 17 clinical trials of behaviour therapy (BT) for depression, which did not include specific cognitive therapy techniques. The authors reasoned that if BT produces the same effects as the more comprehensive CBT package, then this would suggest that the cognitive elements are unnecessary for achieving therapeutic gains. As CBT is a more complicated treatment to train therapists to implement, BT would be an attractive alternative given its apparent parsimony. The results of the meta-analysis appeared to confirm this premise, with BT being equally as effective as CBT, and more effective than control interventions, including treatment as usual, brief psychodynamic therapy and supportive therapy. The dropout rates between BT and the other treatments were similar, and BT appeared to work well regardless of initial severity, length of treatment, or level of therapist training. The authors did not specifically test the comparability of BT and antidepressant medications.
Another meta-analysis reached similar conclusions about the equivalence of CBT and BT1 and a recent large-scale clinical trial of BT showed that it was as effective as antidepressant medication for depression.3 While BT and CBT were equally as effective for lower-levels of depression severity, patients with severe depression specifically benefited more from BT than CBT.3 Behavioural activation, which involves graded activity and goal scheduling, is the central component of BT for depression and may be related to a more general mechanism of change that is operating in many different treatments for depression, especially CBT. The UK’s National Health Service recently allocated £173 million to train more CBT therapists for treating depression and anxiety.4 Ekers and colleagues’ meta-analysis suggests that the money may be best spent training better behaviour therapists.
web only appendix 11/4/108
Authors suggest caution in interpreting results from comparisons versus supportive counselling and brief psychotherapy, due to the small numbers of trials and participants. In these comparisons there were insufficient high quality studies to explore the reasons for heterogeneity. In the comparison of behavioural therapy versus CBT or cognitive therapy, effect size varied according to depression severity at baseline, though this was not the case with behavioural therapy versus control.
Files in this Data Supplement: