Article Text

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is not as effective as electroconvulsive therapy for major depression

Statistics from

OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

Q Is repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation equivalent to electroconvulsive therapy?


Embedded ImageDesign:

Randomised controlled equivalence trial.

Embedded ImageAllocation:


Embedded ImageBlinding:

Single blind (assessors blinded).

Embedded ImageFollow-up period:

Six months.

Embedded ImageSetting:

South London and Maudsley National Health Service Trust, London, and Pembury Hospital, Invicta Mental Health Trust, Kent, UK; recruitment January 2002 to August 2004.

Embedded ImagePatients:

Forty six right-handed adults (aged ⩾18 years) referred for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depression (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders). Main exclusions: inability to receive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or ECT (metallic plates in head, unfit for anaesthesia, history of seizures); rTMS or ECT in previous 6 months; dementia or other axis I diagnosis; substance misuse in previous 6 months.

Embedded ImageIntervention:

rTMS (15 sessions: daily for 5 …

View Full Text

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • EBMH notebook
    Steven Reid