Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Response to: reports of recovery in chronic fatigue syndrome may present less than meets the eye
  1. Tom Kindlon1,
  2. Adrian Baldwin2
  1. 1Irish ME/CFS Association, Dublin, Ireland
  2. 2Bristol, UK
  1. Correspondence to Tom Kindlon, Irish ME/CFS Association, Dublin, Ireland; tomkindlon{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Friedberg and Adamowicz1 make several interesting observations in their review of recovery rates reported in White et al.2 However, we disagree with them that a previous trial of an active behavioural intervention, Deale et al, which reported very similar recovery rates to White et al, ‘used similar recovery criteria’.1–3

The White et al2 recovery criteria were: Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ; Likert scoring) and Short Form (SF)-36 physical functioning (PF) scores in normal range (ie, ≤18 and ≥60, respectively); Oxford CFS criteria not met; and …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.