Statistics from Altmetric.com
QUESTION: In obese binge and non-binge eaters, is cognitive treatment (CT) superior to behavioural treatment (BT) for behaviour and weight outcomes?
University in Maastricht, the Netherlands.
74 obese (body mass index BMI ≥27 kg/m2) women who were 18–50 years of age (mean age 38 y, mean BMI 33 kg/m2). Exclusion criteria were participation in a weight loss programme, alcohol or drug dependence, psychosis, or pregnancy. Patients were categorised as binge eaters (meeting all DSM-IV criteria for binge eating disorder [BED]) (n=37) or non-binge eaters (meeting none of the DSM-IV criteria for BED) (n=37). Patients were thus excluded if they met some of the DSM-IV criteria for BED. 64 patients (86%) completed the treatment.
Patients were allocated to CT or BT according to binge eating status to create 4 groups: CT binge eaters (n=21), CT non-binge eaters (n=16), BT binge eaters (n=16), and BT non-binge eaters (n=21). Both treatments were given in groups for 15 weekly sessions of 150 minutes each. CT was directed at changing dysfunctional cognitions about shape, weight, eating, dieting, and self schemas. BT was directed at learning a healthy eating style, increasing exercise, and anticipating risk situations.
Main outcome measures
Concerns about shape, weight, and eating, and restraint were measured by the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire; weight; depression (Beck Depression Inventory); and self esteem (Rosenberg's Self Esteem Scale). The number of binge eating episodes in 28 days was assessed among binge eaters.
Analysis was by intention to treat. Significant treatment × time interactions were shown between before and after treatment for shape (p<0.001), weight (p<0.001), and eating concern (p<0.01); CT was superior to BT for all 3 subscales. Obese binge eaters improved more than obese non-binge eaters between before and after treatment for shape, weight, and eating concern. Participants receiving BT lost more weight than those receiving CT with significant treatment × time interactions (p<0.001). Binge eaters had a significant weight gain from post treatment to follow up (p<0.01). More participants in the CT group refrained from binging at follow up than participants in the BT group (p<0.01). Significant treatment × time interactions were shown for self esteem (p<0.001). CT was superior to BT for enhancing self esteem between before and after treatment, but not at follow up. Binge eaters improved more in self esteem and depression scores than non-binge eaters.
In obese binge and non-binge eaters, cognitive treatment (CT) was superior to behaviour treatment (BT) for reducing concerns about shape, weight, and eating, and improving self esteem. CT reduced binge eating more than BT.
The study by Nauta et al found CT to produce better outcomes than BT in the treatment of obese binge eaters and obese non-binge eaters. This finding adds to other literature supporting the specific benefit of cognitive interventions in the treatment of people with eating disorders.1 Interestingly, the results contrast with those of studies comparing the efficacy of CT and BT in the treatment of other psychiatric disorders. Meta-analytic and comparative studies indicate that the 2 treatments produce equivalent outcomes in the treatment of social phobia,2 obsessive compulsive disorder,3 and post-traumatic stress disorder.4
The finding by Nauta et al that CT is more effective than BT in the treatment of obese patients is of particular importance because BT has traditionally been the mainstay of obesity treatment. A Cochrane review of psychological treatments of bulimia nervosa and binge eating concluded that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is superior to waiting list controls but not superior to other psychotherapies with respect to abstinence from binge eating.5 Nauta et al suggest that cognitive interventions used as CBT programmes may not be intensive enough to prompt the necessary learning and implementation of cognitive strategies. This unique study comparing CT and BT challenges current treatment approaches to obese binge eaters and obese non-binge eaters.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.