Article Text

PDF

Review: ziprasidone is as effective as haloperidol for schizophrenia but differs in adverse effects
  1. David M Gardner, PharmD
  1. Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 QUESTION: In patients with schizophrenia or other related psychoses, what is the effectiveness of ziprasidone (a novel antipsychotic agent) compared with placebo, conventional, and other novel antipsychotic agents?

    Data sources

    Studies were identified by searching 10 databases and data services, reviewing the reference lists of relevant trials, contacting authors for additional studies, and contacting the manufacturer of ziprasidone for unpublished trials.

    Study selection

    Studies were selected if they were randomised controlled trials that included patients with schizophrenia or other related disorders and compared ziprasidone (oral or intramuscular) with placebo or other antipsychotic agents.

    Data extraction

    Data were extracted on patient characteristics and follow up, setting, interventions, outcome measures (clinical response, leaving the study early, and side effects), and methodological quality.

    Main results

    Analysis was by intention to treat. 7 trials were included (1564 patients). Trials lasted 1 week to >6 months. 3 trials were placebo controlled (2 could be combined [n=441]) and 4 used haloperidol as the comparison group (n=829); no studies comparing ziprasidone with other novel antipsychotics were included. Ziprasidone was superior to placebo for several global effect and mental state measures (table). The groups did not differ for leaving the study early (overall >40%) or for side effects. For the ziprasidone and haloperidol comparison, no studies reported data on global effects. 1 study (n=132) reported change in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores in favour of ziprasidone (3 days intramuscular, then 4 days oral) but another (n=301) showed no clear difference (4 weeks oral). The groups did not differ for leaving the study early (approximately 25%). 2 studies lasting 1 week (n=306) and 28 weeks (n=301) found that ziprasidone, compared with haloperidol, was associated with less akathisia (NNT=8, 95% CI 5 to 18 and NNT=9, CI 5 to 21, respectively) and acute dystonia (NNT=16, CI 9 to 166), but caused more nausea and vomiting (NNH=5, CI 4 to 5 and NNH=9, CI 5 to 33, respectively). 1 study (n=301) reported similar mild weight gains for ziprasidone and haloperidol groups (0.8 to 0.9 kg in women and 0.3 kg in men).

    Ziprasidone v placebo for schizophrenia at 4 to 6 weeks (2 studies)*

    Conclusions

    In patients with schizophrenia or other related psychoses, ziprasidone is superior to placebo in measures of global effect and mental state. Movement disorders are less likely with ziprasidone than with haloperidol but ziprasidone causes more nausea and vomiting.

    Commentary

    Although it awaits marketing, there is already substantial interest in the novel antipsychotic ziprasidone. Pharmacologically it is truly novel. Like other atypical agents, it produces greater blockade of serotonin than dopamine receptors post-synaptically, but unlike its comparators it is also a moderate noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake antagonist and directly affects serotonin autoreceptors.1 These actions suggest a unique clinical profile. However, as shown in this review by Bagnall et al, the premarketing controlled trials do not endorse this prediction.

    The reason for this discordance does not reflect the quality of the systematic review. The authors made great efforts to locate and analyse the available data without bias. It is simply the lack of informative data and the diversity of the study designs found that prevent a more useful evaluation of ziprasidone and limit the confidence clinicians may have when deciding how this agent might be used in their practice.

    As with other novel agents, the reduction of extrapyramidal symptoms observed in this review is an important advantage that may predict less tardive dyskinesia. However, although a fair dose of oral haloperidol (flexible dosing 5–15 mg/d) was used in the 6 month maintenance trial, it was excessive (15 mg/d) in the 4 week short term comparison. The finding of more nausea and vomiting is interesting and may reflect its serotonin reuptake activity. Does this action predict benefit in depressed patients or liability in bipolar patients? The most intriguing aspects of ziprasidone are its low propensity for EPS and its absence of weight gain with long term use (≤ 1 y),2 a combined feature not observed with other novel agents.

    Reflecting its premarketing state of development, more questions than answers remain. Clinicians are left not knowing the effects of ziprasidone in patients with first episode psychosis and treatment refractory patients or its effect on affective, negative, and cognitive symptoms compared with contemporary alternatives. Policy decision makers will be similarly left wanting for comparisons addressing quality of life and healthcare resource use.

    The challenge remains for ziprasidone to show that its clinical benefits emulate its pharmacological uniqueness.

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding: National Health Service Research & Development Health Technology Assessment Programme, UK.

    • For correspondence: Dr A M Bagnall, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK. Fax +44 (0)1904 433661.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.