Article Text

PDF

Age, previous conviction, and psychopathic disorder were associated with conviction after discharge from high security hospitals
  1. R Karl Hanson, PhD
  1. Department of the Solicitor General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    
 
 Questions In patients leaving special, high security hospitals, what is the frequency and type of subsequent criminal conviction and are there any risk factors for subsequent conviction?

    Design

    Inception cohort followed up for 10.5 years.

    Setting

    England and Wales.

    Patients

    425 patients (mean age 38 y, 82% men) who were discharged from special, high security hospitals in England and Wales in 1982 and 1983. 281 (66%) were discharged to hospitals with lesser degrees of security, 122 (29%) went home or to a hostel, and 22 (5%) went back to prison. 190 patients (45%) had been classified as suffering from a mental illness, 141 (33%) from a psychopathic disorder, 72 (17%) as mentally impaired, and 45 (11%) as severely mentally impaired (6% had a dual classification).

    Assessment of prognostic factors

    Data pertaining to sex, age at discharge, number of criminal convictions before entering the special hospital, grounds for detection under the Mental Health Acts of 1959 and 1983, and location immediately after discharge were obtained from hospital records.

    Main outcome measures

    Type and frequency of criminal conviction obtained from the Offenders Index through the Research Statistics Department of the Home Office.

    Main results

    5.5 years after hospital discharge a criminal conviction had been recorded in 24% of the cohort; 9% had been convicted of a serious offence, 8% of a violent offence, and 5% of a sexual offence. 10.5 years after hospital discharge 133 patients (31%) had convictions of any offence, 14% of a serious offence, 14% of a violent offence, and 7% of a sexual offence. After controlling for other variables, results of logistic regression showed that age at discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0.96 {95% CI 0.95 to 0.98}* p=0.002), previous conviction (OR 1.09 {CI 1.06 to 1.11}* p<0.001), and a legal classification of psychopathic disorder (OR 1.68 {CI 1.33 to 2.13}* p=0.03) were associated with conviction after hospital discharge. Thus, being a younger age at discharge, having a previous conviction, and being assigned to the legal category of psychopathic disorder increased the odds of conviction after hospital discharge.

    Conclusion

    Age at discharge, previous conviction, and a legal classification of psychopathic disorder were associated with conviction after discharge from special, high security hospitals.

    Commentary

    The prediction of recidivism among mentally disordered offenders is an important and difficult task. The accuracy of clinical predictions has often been questioned, but recent research has the potential of greatly improving risk assessments. Risk assessments are likely to be accurate to the extent that they consider factors related to recidivism. Unfortunately, many of the standard factors considered by mental health professionals, such as subjective distress and psychiatric symptoms, have not been found to predict recidivism.1 The findings by Buchanan that age, psychopathy, and previous criminal history predict future criminal behaviour among mentally disordered offenders is consistent with a long line ofresearch on general offenders.2 More than 282 studies have examined the association between previous criminal history and recidivism among adult offenders (average r=0.16).2 We now know that the same factors that predict recidivism among general criminal offenders also predict criminal recidivism among mentally disordered offenders.1

    The predictive accuracy of any single factor, however, is limited. The prudent clinician should consider a range of empirically validated risk factors. The most accurate risk assessments use structured scales, which not only specify the factors to consider but also how the factors should be combined. Two of the more promising structured risk assessment instruments are the Level of Service Inventory—Revised and the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide.3, 4

    References

    View Abstract

    Footnotes

    • Source of funding: Special Hospitals Service Authority.

    • For correspondence: Dr A Buchanan, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. Fax +44 (0)171 277 0283.

    • * Numbers calculated from data in article.

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.