Responses

PDF
Review: supportive interventions may improve short-term psychological distress in informal caregivers of patients at the end of life
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]
Publication Date - String

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Response to Dr Goy's commentary
    • Bridget Candy, Dr
    • Other Contributors:
      • Baptiste Leurent, Louise Jones, Michael King

    Dear Editor,

    We thank Dr Goy for her interpretation of our systematic review. She has touched on an important issue in the meta-analysis of complex interventions, which is to keep the right balance between enough power to detect any effect, and combining sometimes heterogeneous trials. We appreciate her comments on the combination of broad psychological outcomes and we would like to take the opportunity to clarify t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.