Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Evidence-Based Mental Health 2006;9:32-34; doi:10.1136/ebmh.9.2.32
Copyright © 2006 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, Royal College of Psychiatrists, & British Psychological Society.

EBMH notebook

APA, NAMI, NMHA, and evidence-based behavioural medicine: a comment

R M Kaplan1, B Spring2, K Davidson3

1 University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
3 Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Abbreviations: APA, American Psychiatric Association • NAMI, National Alliance for the Mentally Ill • NMHA, National Mental Health Association

Key Words: American Psychiatric Association • National Alliance for the Mentally Ill • National Mental Health Association

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In February of 2005, The American Psychiatric Association (APA), National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI), and the National Mental Health Association (NMHA) released a statement publicly criticising the use of evidence-based research reviews for policy decisions affecting patients. Further, they argued against the use of evidence-based standards to guide reimbursement for healthcare services. We reviewed the statement and are concerned that many of the arguments are incorrect or misleading. In this note, we offer our responses by reproducing quotes from the APA-NAMI-NMHA statement and commenting on the merits of the arguments.

CLINICAL JUDGMENT AS EVIDENCE

The statement suggests that clinical experience should be given great weight in evidence-based decisions. The statement argues:

"... true evidence-based approaches marry all available and appropriate scientific research with clinical experience to ensure treatments lead to the best possible outcomes."

We agree that clinical expertise is essential to discern which treatments supported by scientific evidence best match the . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Statement link missing
Thorsten Schumann
EBMH Online, 30 May 2006 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Online Education

Psychiatry CPD/CME from The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Professional Development from The British Psychological Society