© 1998 Evidence-Based Mental Health
Understanding and interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Part 2: meta-analyses
1 Medicines Evaluation Group, Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK
2 Editor, Evidence-Based Mental Health
In part 2, we focus on the statistical combination of the results of a series of studies (meta-analysis). Our objective is to suggest questions that a reader should ask of an article describing a meta-analysis. We will also outline the main methods used in meta-analyses.
Meta-analyses seek to provide the best estimates of treatment effect based upon all the available valid evidence. The simplest type of meta-analysis involves simply counting up the number of statistically significant studies (vote counting).
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Geddes, J.
(2000). Answering clinical questions about prognosis. Evid. Based Ment. Health
3: 100-101
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
